Pompey and the Pirates

-

By the first century BC, Rome had managed to establish itself as the uncontested master of the Mediterranean - controlling the sea from Spain (Hispania) to the Aegean and beyond. Although Roman military might had successfully fought its way through all challengers, Rome faced a very different proposition when it came to that of its latest challenge in the 60s BC - piracy.

Piracy in the Roman World

Piracy was nothing new to the Romans. Pirates had remained a constant threat in the Mediterranean throughout various points in history - disrupting trade, taking slaves and holding prominent prisoners for ransom. However, in the 2nd century BC, Roman conquest in the eastern Mediterranean had left a power vacuum that pirates were able to exploit and subsequently expand their operations. The conquest of Rhodes by Rome, a state that had previously acted as a counter to piracy in the region, had allowed piracy to pick up pace during this period. In particular, Cilicia (in modern day Turkey) had built a fearsome reputation for its links to piracy by the first century. Even a young Julius Caesar was blindsided by pirates - having been captured and ransomed whilst travelling in the East (although, in typical Caesar fashion, he later kept his promise to his captors - having them captured and then crucified after his release).

 Despite this, Roman interest in combating piracy peaked only when the situation began to impact their own bottom line. By the 60s BC, the disrupting influence of piracy on trade was having an effect on Rome’s corn supply. This disruptive influence towards such a fundamental aspect of Roman society was not something those in Rome were willing to accept - in turn providing the opportunity for an unprecedented command to be granted. Whilst earlier campaigns had been undertaken against the pirates across the 1st century BC, in 67 BC it fell to Pompey to end the menace once and for all.

Pompey Takes Command

Pompey had already established a name for himself as a competent military leader and a young rising star prior to 67 BC - but it was his campaign against piracy that would display his talents (and boost his reputation) most clearly. Pompey split the Mediterranean into thirteen different sections, and then divided the sea into two halves - comprising the areas east and west of Sicily. Using this tactic, Pompey was able to rapidly sweep the sea from west to east - pushing pirates into the arms of commanders in each section. After just three months, Pompey had conquered the pirates stronghold in Cilicia and successfully defeated the menace of piracy.
Above: The ancient ruins of Side, modern Turkey - the city was once a hub of ancient piracy. 

Although it should come as no surprise that a man of Pompey’s stature was able to achieve such a feat, it is what followed next that provides the greatest insight into his thought process. Pompey opted to show a great deal of leniency towards those pirates he had defeated - having them resettled and given roles as farmers within their communities. Despite terrorising the seas and causing untold harm to their victims, such a move shows both Pompey’s clemency as a leader, and his ability to plan for the long term. Such a move offered those who had turned to piracy a way out of their predicament, alongside targeting the root of the problem by providing employment and a livelihood to former pirates.

 The major impact of this saga was the role it played in propelling Pompey to future greatness. Through his command of the Mediterranean, Pompey was able to build on his earlier successes and truly establish himself as one of the key players in the political scene back in Rome. The speed and energy with which Pompey approached the situation particularly stands out, with future commands in the east against Mithridates to come as a result of his achievement. Whilst the granting of such substantial commands would have wider impacts on the Republics own long term stability, by the end of his campaign Pompey truly appeared deserving of his epithet ‘The Great’.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mob Rule in Ancient Rome

-
Image
As the chaos unfolded on Capitol Hill last week, it quickly became apparent that we were watching history in the making. An enraged mob, encouraged by the president, storming the home of American democracy and attempting to vent their political frustrations, left many aghast at the scenes unfolding on their television screens. As the dust settles on Capitol Hill, the search for historical precedent is already underway — with the riots marking the first time that the Capitol has been breached  since the War of 1812 . However, we can look even further into the past to see examples of violent mobs seizing control of political institutions. The Roman Republic was no stranger to violence and disorder, and the years before its collapse into civil war and autocracy offer a stark warning for modern day democracies. In the last years of the free republic, Rome saw an uptick in domestic conflict and civil strife — with violence often spilling out onto the streets. Just as last week saw riote
Read more

Party Politics and the Death of Rome

-
Image
The Death of Marcus Porcius Cato has long served as one of the defining moments of Roman history. Having seen the republican forces defeated at Thapsus (in north Africa) by a Caesarian army in 46 BC, Cato found himself holed up in the port town of Utica, a short distance from the battlefield.  On the night  of his death, Cato calmly retired to his bedroom and began reading Plato’s “On the Soul” — before plunging a sword into his stomach. As his attendants burst into the room and tried to save him, Cato continued to injure himself — and finally succumbed to his wound. For many, Cato died as he had lived. Known for his deeply conservative views and traditional values, Cato embodied the Roman belief in personal responsibility and civic duty. At the height of a civil war that would engulf the Roman Republic, and faced with certain defeat, Cato chose to take his own life over living under the dictatorship of Caesar. In death, Cato would display the values that he had espoused as le
Read more

The Catilinarian Conspiracy

-
Image
The world of Roman politics had never been short of intrigue, plots and shadowy business. Throughout its history, the Roman Republic would see dodgy dealings and behind the scene plotting as part and parcel of politics within the city. However, in 63 BC a plot was hatched by a group of conspirators that aimed at an act so heinous that it shock Rome to its foundations. Driven by ambition, greed and bitterness, a group of nobles sought to forcibly overthrow the state and undertake a coup against the Senate. Led by Lucius Sergius Catilina, the conspirators rejected Roman democracy and instead looked to utilise open violence and seize control of the Senate. The affair would become notorious not just for the level of violence and destruction that almost engulfed Rome, but also for the reputation that was made by the hero of the hour – none other than Marcus Tullius Cicero. Bad Reputation For Catiline, this would not be his first brush with controversy. Under the dictatorship o
Read more